0.00/0.04	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.06	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.14/0.42	% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
0.14/0.42	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.42	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.42	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.14/0.42	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.14/0.42	% CPULimit : 1440
0.14/0.42	% WCLimit  : 180
0.14/0.42	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 14:53:27 UTC 2026
0.14/0.43	% CPUTime  : 
0.14/0.43	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.14/0.49	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.25/0.51	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QCkby6AuX9/E---3.1_1228895.p
11.95/2.75	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
11.95/2.75	% Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
11.95/2.75	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
11.95/2.75	% Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores
11.95/2.75	% Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% Starting new_ho_3 with 180s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 1228911 completed with status 0
11.95/2.75	% Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
11.95/2.75	% Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
11.95/2.75	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
11.95/2.75	% Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores
11.95/2.75	% Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% Starting new_ho_3 with 180s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
11.95/2.75	% No SInE strategy applied
11.95/2.75	% Search class: HGUSF-FFMF21-SSSFFMBN
11.95/2.75	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
11.95/2.75	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1228916 completed with status 10
11.95/2.75	% Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 103s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 1228922 completed with status 0
11.95/2.75	% Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
11.95/2.75	% Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
11.95/2.75	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
11.95/2.75	% Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores
11.95/2.75	% Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% Starting new_ho_3 with 180s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
11.95/2.75	% No SInE strategy applied
11.95/2.75	% Search class: HGUSF-FFMF21-SSSFFMBN
11.95/2.75	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
11.95/2.75	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1228916 completed with status 10
11.95/2.75	% Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 103s (1) cores
11.95/2.75	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
11.95/2.75	
11.95/2.75	% Proof found!
11.95/2.75	% SZS status Theorem
11.95/2.75	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_23, type, c0: a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_24, type, x: a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_25, type, cP: a > a > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_27, type, esk2_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_28, type, esk3_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_29, type, esk4_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_30, type, esk5_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_31, type, esk6_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_32, type, esk7_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_33, type, esk8_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(decl_34, type, esk9_1: (a > a > a > $o) > a).
11.95/2.75	thf(cS_INCL_LEM6_pme, conjecture, ((![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a, X4:a]:(((((X3)=(X4))&((X1)=(X2)))<=((cP @ X1 @ X3)=(cP @ X2 @ X4))))&![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2)!=(c0))))=>(![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((($true)&![X6:a, X7:a, X8:a]:((((((X6)=(X8))&((X7)=(c0)))|?[X9:a, X10:a, X11:a, X12:a, X13:a, X14:a]:(((((((X6)=(cP @ X9 @ X10))&((X7)=(cP @ X11 @ X12)))&(X5 @ X9 @ X11 @ X13))&(X5 @ X10 @ X12 @ X14))&((X8)=(cP @ X13 @ X14))))|(((X6)=(c0))&((X7)=(X8))))=>(X5 @ X6 @ X7 @ X8))))=>(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))=>((x)=(c0)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QCkby6AuX9/E---3.1_1228895.p', cS_INCL_LEM6_pme)).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a, X4:a]:(((((X3)=(X4))&((X1)=(X2)))<=((cP @ X1 @ X3)=(cP @ X2 @ X4))))&![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2)!=(c0))))=>(![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((($true)&![X6:a, X7:a, X8:a]:((((((X6)=(X8))&((X7)=(c0)))|?[X9:a, X10:a, X11:a, X12:a, X13:a, X14:a]:(((((((X6)=(cP @ X9 @ X10))&((X7)=(cP @ X11 @ X12)))&(X5 @ X9 @ X11 @ X13))&(X5 @ X10 @ X12 @ X14))&((X8)=(cP @ X13 @ X14))))|(((X6)=(c0))&((X7)=(X8))))=>(X5 @ X6 @ X7 @ X8))))=>(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))=>((x)=(c0))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cS_INCL_LEM6_pme])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(((![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a, X4:a]:((((cP @ X1 @ X3)=(cP @ X2 @ X4))=>(((X3)=(X4))&((X1)=(X2)))))&![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2)!=(c0))))=>(![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((($true&![X6:a, X7:a, X8:a]:((((((X6)=(X8))&((X7)=(c0)))|?[X9:a, X10:a, X11:a, X12:a, X13:a, X14:a]:(((((((X6)=(cP @ X9 @ X10))&((X7)=(cP @ X11 @ X12)))&(X5 @ X9 @ X11 @ X13))&(X5 @ X10 @ X12 @ X14))&((X8)=(cP @ X13 @ X14))))|(((X6)=(c0))&((X7)=(X8))))=>(X5 @ X6 @ X7 @ X8))))=>(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))=>((x)=(c0))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X31:a, X32:a, X33:a, X34:a, X35:a, X36:a, X37:a > a > a > $o]:(((((((X33)=(X34))|((cP @ X31 @ X33)!=(cP @ X32 @ X34)))&(((X31)=(X32))|((cP @ X31 @ X33)!=(cP @ X32 @ X34))))&((cP @ X35 @ X36)!=(c0)))&(((((((((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk5_1 @ X37)))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk5_1 @ X37)))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))&((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37)))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37)))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))))&((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((X37 @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk8_1 @ X37))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((X37 @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk8_1 @ X37))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))))&((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((X37 @ (esk5_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((X37 @ (esk5_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))))&((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk3_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37)))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk3_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37)))|((esk1_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))))&((((((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk5_1 @ X37)))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk1_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk5_1 @ X37)))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))&((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37)))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37)))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))))&((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((X37 @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk8_1 @ X37))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((X37 @ (esk4_1 @ X37) @ (esk6_1 @ X37) @ (esk8_1 @ X37))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))))&((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|((X37 @ (esk5_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|((X37 @ (esk5_1 @ X37) @ (esk7_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))))&((((esk1_1 @ X37)=(c0))|(((esk3_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37)))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0))&(((esk2_1 @ X37)=(esk3_1 @ X37))|(((esk3_1 @ X37)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X37) @ (esk9_1 @ X37)))|((esk2_1 @ X37)=(c0)))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))))&(~(X37 @ (esk1_1 @ X37) @ (esk2_1 @ X37) @ (esk3_1 @ X37))|~($true)|(X37 @ x @ c0 @ c0)))&((x)!=(c0))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~((X5 @ (esk1_1 @ X5) @ (esk2_1 @ X5) @ (esk3_1 @ X5)))|~(($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~((X5 @ (esk1_1 @ X5) @ (esk2_1 @ X5) @ (esk3_1 @ X5))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ X5)=(c0))|((esk3_1 @ X5)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X5) @ (esk9_1 @ X5)))|((esk1_1 @ X5)=(esk3_1 @ X5))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~(($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X51:a > a > a > $o, X50:a > a > a > $o]:(((X51 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|(X50 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~(((X51 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))))|(X50 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X51 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X50 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))))))))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2)!=(c0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ X5)=(c0))|((esk3_1 @ X5)=(esk1_1 @ X5))|((esk3_1 @ X5)=(cP @ (esk8_1 @ X5) @ (esk9_1 @ X5)))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X21:a > a > a > $o, X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|(X21 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~((X5 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))))))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk3_1 @ X5)=(esk1_1 @ X5))|((esk1_1 @ X5)=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|((esk3_1 @ X5)!=(c0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk3_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|(((Z2)!=(c0)))))))=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_10])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|(((Z2)!=(c0)))))))=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])])])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~(((X5 @ c0 @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|(((Z2)!=(c0))))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|(((Z2)!=(c0))))))))|((esk3_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|(((Z2)!=(c0)))))))!=(c0)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_13])])])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk3_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|(((Z2)!=(c0)))))))=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X21:a > a > a > $o, X5:a > a > a > $o]:(((X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|(X21 @ x @ c0 @ c0)|~((X21 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X21 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2)))))))))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:((((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))|(((Z2)!=(c0)))))))=(c0))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_15])])])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a > a > a > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:a, Z1:a, Z2:a]:(((((Z0)!=(x)))|((X5 @ Z0 @ Z1 @ Z2))))))=(x))|(X5 @ x @ c0 @ c0))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_16])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ((x)!=(c0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
11.95/2.75	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])])]), c_0_19]), ['proof']).
11.95/2.75	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
11.95/2.75	% Parsed axioms                        : 5
11.95/2.75	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
11.95/2.75	% Initial clauses                      : 29
11.95/2.75	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
11.95/2.75	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
11.95/2.75	% Processed clauses                    : 2284
11.95/2.75	% ...of these trivial                  : 3
11.95/2.75	% ...subsumed                          : 1004
11.95/2.75	% ...remaining for further processing  : 1277
11.95/2.75	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
11.95/2.75	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
11.95/2.75	% Backward-subsumed                    : 107
11.95/2.75	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
11.95/2.75	% Generated clauses                    : 12454
11.95/2.75	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11329
11.95/2.75	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
11.95/2.75	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
11.95/2.75	% Paramodulations                      : 4924
11.95/2.75	% Factorizations                       : 3
11.95/2.75	% NegExts                              : 530
11.95/2.75	% Equation resolutions                 : 101
11.95/2.75	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
11.95/2.75	% Total rewrite steps                  : 1230
11.95/2.75	% ...of those cached                   : 1225
11.95/2.75	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
11.95/2.75	%    Propositional check models        : 0
11.95/2.75	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
11.95/2.75	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
11.95/2.75	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
11.95/2.75	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
11.95/2.75	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
11.95/2.75	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
11.95/2.75	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
11.95/2.75	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
11.95/2.75	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
11.95/2.75	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
11.95/2.75	% Current number of processed clauses  : 989
11.95/2.75	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
11.95/2.75	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
11.95/2.75	%    Negative unit clauses             : 2
11.95/2.75	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 979
11.95/2.75	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8692
11.95/2.75	% ...number of literals in the above   : 63447
11.95/2.75	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
11.95/2.75	% Current number of archived clauses   : 288
11.95/2.75	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 131454
11.95/2.75	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10077
11.95/2.75	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1046
11.95/2.75	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 157
11.95/2.75	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
11.95/2.75	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
11.95/2.75	% BW rewrite match successes           : 3
11.95/2.75	% Condensation attempts                : 0
11.95/2.75	% Condensation successes               : 0
11.95/2.75	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 971891
11.95/2.75	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 579
11.95/2.75	
11.95/2.75	% -------------------------------------------------
11.95/2.75	% User time                : 2.179 s
11.95/2.75	% System time              : 0.031 s
11.95/2.75	% Total time               : 2.210 s
11.95/2.75	% Maximum resident set size: 3588 pages
11.95/2.75	
11.95/2.75	% -------------------------------------------------
11.95/2.75	% User time                : 2.180 s
11.95/2.75	% System time              : 0.039 s
11.95/2.75	% Total time               : 2.219 s
11.95/2.75	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
11.95/2.75	% E exiting
11.95/2.75	EOF